At this point, it is important to make whatsapp phone number list a clarification. Many have criticized the 2001 and 2012 census ballots, specifically attacking the methodology to investigate identity in both processes. These critics point whatsapp phone number list out as an error the fact that neither of the two questionnaires had the “mestizo” category among the response options. These arguments are based on the assumption that the mestizaje processes would have diluted self-affirmative sentiments in Bolivia. Therefore, 62% of Bolivians whatsapp phone number list who said they belonged to ethnic communities (2001) or 42% who.
A declared they were "peasant native whatsapp phone number list indigenous" (2012) would be the result of a distortion caused by the lack of the alternative of a hybrid belonging. However, these analyzes overlook the fact that the category in question (mestizo) has two characteristics: (a) is a concept of racial personification (such as indigenous and white) and not of ethnic self-affirmation, since its expressiveness simply describes skin color, language, and clothing. As we have said, we have to distinguish whatsapp phone number list between ethnic self-affirmation and racial.
We personification. In this whatsapp phone number list regard, the 2001 census included among its questions the question of whether Bolivians identified with an Aymara, Quechua, Guaraní or other origin, a question that clearly whatsapp phone number list sought to establish the genealogy of those interviewed and not so much their racial personification; (b) in my view, the 2012 census replaced the ethnic self-assertion question with a confusing query that mixed self-assertion, personification, and social class in a search that may have generated whatsapp phone number list several different responses from the same respondents.